<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Liam broke my site! Plus some stuff on platform independence.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://meganmcdermott.com/2007/01/20/liam-broke-my-site-plus-some-stuff-on-platform-independence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://meganmcdermott.com/2007/01/20/liam-broke-my-site-plus-some-stuff-on-platform-independence/</link>
	<description>Web design and that</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 15:50:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: andyk</title>
		<link>http://meganmcdermott.com/2007/01/20/liam-broke-my-site-plus-some-stuff-on-platform-independence/comment-page-1/#comment-4793</link>
		<dc:creator>andyk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meganmcdermott.com/2007/01/20/liam-broke-my-site-plus-some-stuff-on-platform-independence/#comment-4793</guid>
		<description>Hey... a couple of points:

1) Are you gonna get a 301 redirect sorted on the old domain any time soon? I only noticed you were here because I had inbound links showing from you in WordPress... ;)

2) I tagged you in a meme... see my site for details. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey&#8230; a couple of points:</p>
<p>1) Are you gonna get a 301 redirect sorted on the old domain any time soon? I only noticed you were here because I had inbound links showing from you in WordPress&#8230; <img src='http://meganmcdermott.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>2) I tagged you in a meme&#8230; see my site for details. <img src='http://meganmcdermott.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liam McDermott</title>
		<link>http://meganmcdermott.com/2007/01/20/liam-broke-my-site-plus-some-stuff-on-platform-independence/comment-page-1/#comment-4792</link>
		<dc:creator>Liam McDermott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 04:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meganmcdermott.com/2007/01/20/liam-broke-my-site-plus-some-stuff-on-platform-independence/#comment-4792</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;That’s what I’ve heard also, the ribbon interface is great, and easy to use,&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Well that&#039;s the case for someone who&#039;s happy to relearn an interface (or a new user), but the average office worker is going to be very confused when confronted with that ribbon!

&lt;blockquote&gt;I wonder how much longer until we see an on demand operating system, where you install a handful of core layers, and everything else is download/run? I wouldn’t mind a pay-as-you-go approach either, I don’t need 70% of the stuff that Win XP installs by default,&lt;/blockquote&gt;
We all have access to that on-demand system you&#039;re talking about, it&#039;s just most people don&#039;t know it exists: http://www.ubuntu.com it&#039;s completely Free though.

It&#039;s pretty close, although you do get as much software with it as they can cram on a CD. :)

Whenever you need a peice of software, you get it using &#039;Synaptic Package Manager&#039; which downloads it from the Ubuntu software repositories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>That’s what I’ve heard also, the ribbon interface is great, and easy to use,</p></blockquote>
<p>Well that&#8217;s the case for someone who&#8217;s happy to relearn an interface (or a new user), but the average office worker is going to be very confused when confronted with that ribbon!</p>
<blockquote><p>I wonder how much longer until we see an on demand operating system, where you install a handful of core layers, and everything else is download/run? I wouldn’t mind a pay-as-you-go approach either, I don’t need 70% of the stuff that Win XP installs by default,</p></blockquote>
<p>We all have access to that on-demand system you&#8217;re talking about, it&#8217;s just most people don&#8217;t know it exists: <a href="http://www.ubuntu.com">http://www.ubuntu.com</a> it&#8217;s completely Free though.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s pretty close, although you do get as much software with it as they can cram on a CD. <img src='http://meganmcdermott.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Whenever you need a peice of software, you get it using &#8216;Synaptic Package Manager&#8217; which downloads it from the Ubuntu software repositories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Kinder</title>
		<link>http://meganmcdermott.com/2007/01/20/liam-broke-my-site-plus-some-stuff-on-platform-independence/comment-page-1/#comment-4791</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Kinder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 20:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meganmcdermott.com/2007/01/20/liam-broke-my-site-plus-some-stuff-on-platform-independence/#comment-4791</guid>
		<description>&quot;Liam and I did a little preview of Office 2007 last night and I got the impression that they are sort of catering more towards power users. I thought that Word ‘07 would be great for people who are writing a book or something but for regular people it’s total overkill.&quot;

That&#039;s what I&#039;ve heard also, the ribbon interface is great, and easy to use, but from most reviews that I&#039;ve seen, the overall application has been steered towards heavy document usage, not the &#039;gotta write a book report for school&#039; crowd that Office 95 first hooked.  

I wonder how much longer until we see an on demand operating system, where you install a handful of core layers, and everything else is download/run?  I wouldn&#039;t mind a pay-as-you-go approach either, I don&#039;t need 70% of the stuff that Win XP installs by default, but I do have 8-10 applications that I would die without.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Liam and I did a little preview of Office 2007 last night and I got the impression that they are sort of catering more towards power users. I thought that Word ‘07 would be great for people who are writing a book or something but for regular people it’s total overkill.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what I&#8217;ve heard also, the ribbon interface is great, and easy to use, but from most reviews that I&#8217;ve seen, the overall application has been steered towards heavy document usage, not the &#8216;gotta write a book report for school&#8217; crowd that Office 95 first hooked.  </p>
<p>I wonder how much longer until we see an on demand operating system, where you install a handful of core layers, and everything else is download/run?  I wouldn&#8217;t mind a pay-as-you-go approach either, I don&#8217;t need 70% of the stuff that Win XP installs by default, but I do have 8-10 applications that I would die without.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
