<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can a Great Website use Tables for Layout?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://meganmcdermott.com/2007/08/24/can-a-great-website-use-tables-for-layout/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://meganmcdermott.com/2007/08/24/can-a-great-website-use-tables-for-layout/</link>
	<description>Web design and that</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 15:50:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megan</title>
		<link>http://meganmcdermott.com/2007/08/24/can-a-great-website-use-tables-for-layout/comment-page-1/#comment-10861</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 19:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meganmcdermott.com/2007/08/24/can-a-great-website-use-tables-for-layout/#comment-10861</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; rather not get into a discussion about whether tables are bad or not. That wasn&#039;t really the point of this post. Amazon and Google wouldn&#039;t necessarily fit my definition of &quot;Great Websites&quot; here. However, they do help to prove the point I was trying to make in that the CSS/tables question isn&#039;t exactly pivotal in the overall success of a website. I think all of these sites would be better served by a CSS layout but, again, that wasn&#039;t the point :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d <em>really</em> rather not get into a discussion about whether tables are bad or not. That wasn&#8217;t really the point of this post. Amazon and Google wouldn&#8217;t necessarily fit my definition of &#8220;Great Websites&#8221; here. However, they do help to prove the point I was trying to make in that the CSS/tables question isn&#8217;t exactly pivotal in the overall success of a website. I think all of these sites would be better served by a CSS layout but, again, that wasn&#8217;t the point <img src='http://meganmcdermott.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alojamento</title>
		<link>http://meganmcdermott.com/2007/08/24/can-a-great-website-use-tables-for-layout/comment-page-1/#comment-10853</link>
		<dc:creator>Alojamento</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 15:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meganmcdermott.com/2007/08/24/can-a-great-website-use-tables-for-layout/#comment-10853</guid>
		<description>Amazon uses tables for layout, even the minimalistic design of Google uses tables for layout - CSS is good for a lot of things but at this point I feel that it&#039;s not as flexible as it should be. Table-based designs take less work and are more predictable on browsers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazon uses tables for layout, even the minimalistic design of Google uses tables for layout &#8211; CSS is good for a lot of things but at this point I feel that it&#8217;s not as flexible as it should be. Table-based designs take less work and are more predictable on browsers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Croft</title>
		<link>http://meganmcdermott.com/2007/08/24/can-a-great-website-use-tables-for-layout/comment-page-1/#comment-10351</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Croft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 15:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meganmcdermott.com/2007/08/24/can-a-great-website-use-tables-for-layout/#comment-10351</guid>
		<description>Well-said! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well-said! <img src='http://meganmcdermott.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
