<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If a cool feature is never used, is it still cool?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://meganmcdermott.com/2008/04/03/if-a-cool-feature-is-never-used-is-it-still-cool/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://meganmcdermott.com/2008/04/03/if-a-cool-feature-is-never-used-is-it-still-cool/</link>
	<description>Web design and that</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:00:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Sefton</title>
		<link>http://meganmcdermott.com/2008/04/03/if-a-cool-feature-is-never-used-is-it-still-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-24251</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Sefton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 11:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meganmcdermott.com/2008/04/03/if-a-cool-feature-is-never-used-is-it-still-cool/#comment-24251</guid>
		<description>I cool feature that is not used much can still be cool. Where the magic comes in is the transition from &quot;cool&quot; to useful. If you can get that right then you have something special.

I think it&#039;s a numbers game in most circumstances, you need to develop several &quot;cool&quot; products to find the one that is &quot;useful&quot;

Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cool feature that is not used much can still be cool. Where the magic comes in is the transition from &#8220;cool&#8221; to useful. If you can get that right then you have something special.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s a numbers game in most circumstances, you need to develop several &#8220;cool&#8221; products to find the one that is &#8220;useful&#8221;</p>
<p>Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andyw</title>
		<link>http://meganmcdermott.com/2008/04/03/if-a-cool-feature-is-never-used-is-it-still-cool/comment-page-1/#comment-20691</link>
		<dc:creator>andyw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 11:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meganmcdermott.com/2008/04/03/if-a-cool-feature-is-never-used-is-it-still-cool/#comment-20691</guid>
		<description>Totally agree - AJAX and public API&#039;s are just tools you can use to create a project. Just because you can use them, doesn&#039;t always mean that you should, I&#039;m getting fed up of seeing things use AJAX for the sake of it.

That said, I&#039;m also getting annoyed at seeing solutions that don&#039;t use AJAX when a bit of client side scripting would go a long way to improving the user interface.

Heads you win, Tails you loose ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree &#8211; AJAX and public API&#8217;s are just tools you can use to create a project. Just because you can use them, doesn&#8217;t always mean that you should, I&#8217;m getting fed up of seeing things use AJAX for the sake of it.</p>
<p>That said, I&#8217;m also getting annoyed at seeing solutions that don&#8217;t use AJAX when a bit of client side scripting would go a long way to improving the user interface.</p>
<p>Heads you win, Tails you loose <img src='http://meganmcdermott.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

