<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chunky footers: yay or nay?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://meganmcdermott.com/2008/09/12/chunky-footers-yay-nay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://meganmcdermott.com/2008/09/12/chunky-footers-yay-nay/</link>
	<description>Web design and that</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 15:50:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torbjørn Lunde</title>
		<link>http://meganmcdermott.com/2008/09/12/chunky-footers-yay-nay/comment-page-1/#comment-32980</link>
		<dc:creator>Torbjørn Lunde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 11:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meganmcdermott.com/?p=282#comment-32980</guid>
		<description>I would be carefull with using them for anything important.
I think they work as a kind of index, overview or sitemaps(if the site is simple enough). I think it some cases having some information(usually links) in footer than on the sides could make the sites less cluttered.

On the sites I&#039;m involved with we only have tiny footers that we use for sister-sites links. 

I think it&#039;s best to see the situation, the site and what it needs.

And no, I did not see the &quot;Recent Posts&quot; untill you told me. Strangeley I&#039;ve noticed footer bars on many other websites. I think it seem to work on short pages. 

You shouldn&#039;t listen to me though, I&#039;m no Nielsen, I&#039;m just a graphic designer trainee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be carefull with using them for anything important.<br />
I think they work as a kind of index, overview or sitemaps(if the site is simple enough). I think it some cases having some information(usually links) in footer than on the sides could make the sites less cluttered.</p>
<p>On the sites I&#8217;m involved with we only have tiny footers that we use for sister-sites links. </p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s best to see the situation, the site and what it needs.</p>
<p>And no, I did not see the &#8220;Recent Posts&#8221; untill you told me. Strangeley I&#8217;ve noticed footer bars on many other websites. I think it seem to work on short pages. </p>
<p>You shouldn&#8217;t listen to me though, I&#8217;m no Nielsen, I&#8217;m just a graphic designer trainee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam H</title>
		<link>http://meganmcdermott.com/2008/09/12/chunky-footers-yay-nay/comment-page-1/#comment-31543</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 12:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meganmcdermott.com/?p=282#comment-31543</guid>
		<description>Yaaay! I&#039;ve used them before on my sites. Works pretty well and removes a lot of clutter from the side bar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yaaay! I&#8217;ve used them before on my sites. Works pretty well and removes a lot of clutter from the side bar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
