I have been on maternity leave since October so I’m not entirely sure of the reasons for this decision. I know that some people went for training on the Open Text system in November and found it to be very cumbersome and difficult to use (something I thought was evident from the beginning, to be honest!). I think there were some other issues as well but I don’t know too much.

Needless to say, I am thrilled!  There is a tiny bit more information on the Kitchener Waterloo Drupal User’s Group, as well as in the UW Daily Bulletin.

I did do my best to sell the benefits of Drupal to the committee, and to explain why the OpenText product (formerly called RedDot) was not a good solution (phrasing it politely). However, I’m not sure that, given the chance, “we” would have chosen Drupal anyway. Why? Here’s a few of the biggest objections given by others in the group:

1. Sever models – the other two systems under consideration used a “push” model where static pages would be published to outlying web servers. This was considered to be preferable to a centralized model where pages are served by a database. Why? Mainly because many units within the university really want to run their own web servers. They also liked that the main system was “behind the firewall” and therefore more secure. This issue was focused on by some people to the exclusion of any other factors (usability? functionality? extensibility? who cares?). A few people actually said that since these two systems used the same publishing model then they were “really the same”.
2. “It’s not enterprise” - I’m not sure what this is actually supposed to mean but it was a big problem for some people (and I’ve heard this in other higher ed circles as well). Maybe if it had a sticker price of half a million dollars and  obscenely complicated server requirements, then it would be “enterprise”??
3. Security – there are still many people out there who believe that open source must be insecure because it’s developed by “some guy in his basement.”

There might have been other issues, had we ever gotten around to actually testing Drupal against the other two systems. Drupal isn’t exactly known for its usability, but from what I saw from the others Drupal isn’t any worse and might actually be better. To be honest, our presentation from Acquia didn’t do a lot to make the benefits of Drupal more clear.

Until now the Mac has been my primary machine – home of email, web browsing, scheduling, and my main design activities. Why? Because that’s the way I set it up at first, before my laptop arrived. I used the laptop mainly for harder development activities, and file transfers (more on that later).

This week I finally decided to move to the Ubuntu machine for my primary activities. Why? Because I just don’t like OSX that much. It hinders my activities in some pretty significant ways.

Why I’m leaving Mac

1. Crap file management.The Finder doesn’t work for me. No location bar and no tree strucure side panel makes it difficult to navigate folders and move files around the way I want to.
2. Insufficient panels & customization. In Ubuntu I can have as many panels I want, can put all kinds of stuff on them, and can arrange them however I want. In OSX You just have the dock, and you can really only put applications or files on them, and you can’t even put in a separator to keep them organized.
3. Various other annoyances. Such as:
   • program menus are glued to the top of the screen on one monitor only, which detaches them from the window. This is especailly annoying when the program you’re using is on the second monitor.
   • the date/time doesn’t open to a navigable calendar. I often use this to check dates in the past or future.
   • you can’t see hidden files unless you run a command from the terminal to turn them on. Thus, hidden files are either always on or always off.

Why I’m keeping Mac

I’ll keep the Mac around for some tasks (I have a KVM switch set up so I can easily toggle between the two), including:

1. Those pesky .docx files. Correction: Open Office is now able to open .docx format. This must be new because when I tried last week it didn’t work.
2. Dreamweaver – until we get a CMS in place I still need to manage sites built with DW templates.
3. Photoshop – because sometimes the Gimp isn’t enough.

Update 02/09: My apologies for the tone of this post. I didn’t mean for it to be inflamatory in any way. I actually had made some edits that were accidentally lost (how, I don’t know!). Sorry about that!

Update 03/09: Comments on this post are now moderated.

The new design is surely nicer looking than the old (although I didn’t really have a problem with the old design). They’ve made quite a few interface changes – some good, some not so good. Read on to see some screenshots and analysis of the new interface.

I must preface this by saying that I haven’t had a chance to read much about the new design – there may be some rationale for a lot of these changes that I don’t know about. I also don’t participate at the WordPress forums. Of the old WordPress admin panel, Happy cog says:

“There was a randomness and unpredictability to everything from the location of key functions to the number of items in the navigation menu.”

I don’t feel that the new interface is much of an improvement in this regard. In fact, I find some elements to be even more random and unpredictable than before. I gather that they were trying to keep the peripheral tasks out of the way, but what they’ve ended up doing is mixing different types of tasks and moving some things too far from where you need them.

Note: Screenshots of the old WordPress interface are available here (those are from a slightly older version but you’ll get the gist). In this post all screenshots link to the full versions.

The header

This is the new WordPress header:

Notice how they’ve split up the navigation links into 2 main places with some secondary links at the very top (They all used to be in one long list). My biggest problem with this is that the design link is in with the content editing links and not with the administration. As we’ll see below, the designers seem to think that WordPress users change their themes a lot. I don’t.

The dashboard link has also been moved way up to the top corner where you can barely even see it. The dashboard is an important page, the link to it should be more prominent.

The dashboard

The new dashboard layout is one of the most celebrated changes in WordPress 2.5. The old dashboard had a brief welcome bit with some quick links to common tasks and a sidebar with links to your latest incoming links, comments and posts. The bulk of the page was made up of recent news from the WordPress development blog. Not the greatest use of space.

The new dashboard has improved the information provided but I still think it could be better. Take the top section under the orange header:

One of my big annoyances with this page is the way they’ve done the incoming links box:

Almost everything about this is wrong:

• The list does not include the title of the post being linked.
• The link is on the word “saying”, not the post tile. We know now to avoid “click here” links, right? This is the same thing.
• The quoted text is the opening line of the post, not the reference to your post.

You can edit this box but that only allows you to change the number of items shown and the post date (which was not displayed by default, if I remember correctly). For me the option to show the date doesn’t actually work.

The incoming links box should:

• display the title of the linking post.
• display the date of the linking post.
• display the author/site title of the linking post.
• if possible, display the context of the link to your site.
• link the title to the referrring page.
• provide options to let you turn all of these elements on or off.

(And, yes, my backlinks are really pathetic!)

The post composer & editor

This is where you go to write new posts. In the new interface they’ve moved a lot of the options to the space below the post editor, instead of keeping them in the sidebar. The only thing they kept in the sidebar is the preview and save/publish links, plus a list of related links.

There are a couple of reasons why this is really annoying:

• When I finish writing a post, my eye is at the bottom of the post text box. Now I want to either preview my post or publish it. But where are the buttons to do that? Not right underneath the post box where they should be, they’re over in the sidebar near the top of the page.
• When i start writing a post I want to make sure I remember to enter the tags and categories. In the old interface this was next to the post box where I could see it from the start. Now I have to remember to scroll down below the bottom of the post box and fill in those options.
• Meanwhile, the permalink edit option is right at the top, under the title of the post. How does that make sense? (Not shown in screenshot – this only shows up after a post has been saved once)
• The new arrangement of the page, along with the larger size of headings and bigger margins means that this is a much longer page than it used to be. There’s a lot of unnecessary scrolling.
• The related links bit is really unnecessary because those pages are easily accessible through the header menus

The image uploader

One of the things they’ve added here is a media library feature that can be accessed through the write interface. It seems they think that WordPress users like to add a lot of audio and video and stuff. I don’t. Image uploading is enough for me.

The other problem with this tool is that it doesn’t actually work. I found out later that it uses flash, which is a bit of an issue in Opera/Linux. (Flash does work in Opera/Linux, it just doesn’t work well). I was fiddling around with my permissions trying to figure out why this didn’t work but it turns out that all sorts of other things could be going wrong. I didn’t get any error messages either.

I’m also not a huge fan of the lightbox effect. I guess some people think this is cool but for me it’s kind of lame and annoying.

Other new features

I am happy that the new visual editor works in Opera. I can write HTML just fine but when I’m writing I prefer to concentrate on writing and looking at mark-up gets in the way.

Tagging is fully integrated in the 2.5 which is nice to have. You used to have to install a plugin for that. However, I must wonder if it’s really necessary to include these things in core when they can be easily managed by plugins.

It is really awesome to have notification of updates to plugins and an easy way to install them quickly. Although now I know how to use wget and I’d rather do it that way…

Final thoughts

I guess this release was designed with a certain type of blogger in mind. Someone who uses a lot of multimedia and changes themes a lot. That’s not me. I’m not a super hard core wordpress user like some people. I like the platform but I don’t really have time to spend much time playing with it and participating in the community. I guess it’s time for me to delve into creating a custom CSS and checking out some of the plugins available for the admin panel.

Edit: I just came in to fix some type-os and once again attempted to scroll to the bottom to find the save button! This is going to take some getting used to.

We chose Drupal partly because our content site was already built on it so it’s a good opportunity for integration. We also have the programming expertise to make it work just the way we want to. With vBulletin we were often making do and putting in work-arounds to accomplish certain tasks. We also considered Vanilla and punBB – both open source, standards compliant, modular forum platforms.

The move didn’t go entirely smoothly. We decided to do it at Christmas time because we knew traffic would drop andway and if there were going to be problems, this would be the best time to sort them out. The biggest problem turned out to be the module that was generating the Google sitemaps, which brought the sever down a number of times before Liam figured out how to fix it. Unfortunately, our server admins are in the UK and weren’t availble to respond as quickly as we needed them to.

As with any change, we are experiencing a temporary drop in search rankings and visitor traffic. Members will awhile to get used to the new format, and surely some will choose not to come back. It will take some time to build the community back up again but in the end we feel the change will be well worth it.

If you’re not a member already, I hope you’ll stop by the forums and join us. We work hard to keep up a friendly, knowledgeable, spam free community.

(This actually happened just before Christmas but I wasn’t able to post because I’ve been sick for 2 weeks Expect a short flurry of posts as I catch up on things I’ve been thinking about).

Comments are now closed on this post. I was getting a lot of spam on it for some reason. If you would like to discuss this further, please visit the Webmaster Forums discussion on this topic.

Was I ever missing out! I’ve ben using OSX for over a month now at my new job. Although I wouldn’t say I’m enamored with it I do appreciate many differences from Windows. Liam (my husband) encouraged me to swtich to linux at home (when I had my old computer last year) and I haven’t looked back. Just this week I installed Ubuntu on a new laptop at work (and put Windows in virtualization) without much trouble at all. Any problems are always a quick Ubuntu Forums search away. I’ve always been big on customization so Linux is a great choice for me.

As an avid computer user and web professional it’s been a great experience to have a better understanding of how other operating systems work. Can you imagine only ever using Inernet Explorer? Of course not! So why are you satistfied with the default operating system that came with your computer?

I’m finding that OSX + Ubuntu is a great combination for web design. OSX for graphics, multimedia, and Dreamweaver. Ubunutu for file management and development tasks (one of the reasons why I wanted a Linux laptop is because I find the file manager in OSX to be really limiting). Of course, it helps that right now my Mac is hooked up to the nice big monitors That may change…

Come think of it, the lack of diversity in operating systems is really kind of sad. I don’t mean that alternatives aren’t available — they are. But the general computer using masses have very little awareness of them. Can you imagine if everyone drove the same kind of car? Or bought the same kind of DVD player? With almost any product used by regular people you can think of a wealth of alternatives. Consumers have choice. With operating systems, they don’t take advantage of the choices available. But you can’t really blame the average consumer, because the choice really isn’t available. Ever try to purchase a PC with no operating system or even an operating system other than windows? Generally not available (unless you know where to look and even then it’s difficult).